Metropower Portal
Metropower Portal
Search | Statistics | User listing Forums | Calendars |
You are logged in as a guest. ( logon | register )


wet liner or a damp one....
Moderators:

   Technical Area-> TechnicalMessage format
 
 
mettymad
Posted 16/2/2006 3:46 AM (#110327)
Subject: wet liner or a damp one....
Elite Veteran

Posts: 1104
1000100
Location: 1066 country
I have been advised that I can fit a wet lined gti head onto my gta damp lined bottom, is this possible and easy to do. Any advice is welcome.

And I am sure there will be some comments and double inuendos regarding the above.
 
metrocedes
Posted 16/2/2006 4:03 AM (#110332 - in reply to #110327)
Subject: RE: wet liner or a damp one....


R116GTa

Posts: 3823
20001000500100100100
Location: Bridgend S.Wales
from my understanding of wet and damp which i was told about two days ago.....no chance.it has a different water and oil channel set up so wont match but then i was only told the other day and was a honda engine.
 
Beep
Posted 16/2/2006 4:16 AM (#110335 - in reply to #110327)
Subject: RE: wet liner or a damp one....
10025
Don't know, but you will have to have the cut outs in the piston crowns to clear a 16v head, I think all MPi 8v had this.
 
metrocedes
Posted 16/2/2006 4:56 AM (#110340 - in reply to #110327)
Subject: RE: wet liner or a damp one....


R116GTa

Posts: 3823
20001000500100100100
Location: Bridgend S.Wales
then theres the ecu and alarm ect to sort out.
 
mettymad
Posted 16/2/2006 5:15 AM (#110342 - in reply to #110327)
Subject: RE: wet liner or a damp one....
Elite Veteran

Posts: 1104
1000100
Location: 1066 country
The electrics wizard that is Tonyb suggested that it was possible but I asked the peroson who is assisting me and he wanted some more info before we do the engine or head swap on Saturday.
 
Rob VVC
Posted 16/2/2006 5:52 AM (#110346 - in reply to #110327)
Subject: RE: wet liner or a damp one....
R A Autobodies

Posts: 3775
20001000500100100252525
Location: Out the area!
I would just do a engine swap instead of messing about splitting the heads of the engines as you will want new gaskets ect when building back up plus you can sell the old engine already built
 
tonyb
Posted 16/2/2006 6:39 AM (#110363 - in reply to #110346)
Subject: RE: wet liner or a damp one....


Electrical genius

Posts: 1310
1000100100100
Location: East Devon
Hi Rob

Yes - I mentioned to Elliot about changing head.

Swings and roundabouts really. Time vs money. To change engine - cost of hiring engine hoist
vs gasket set etc.

As I said to Elliot his engine has a known history.

tony
 
metrocedes
Posted 16/2/2006 5:55 AM (#110347 - in reply to #110327)
Subject: RE: wet liner or a damp one....


R116GTa

Posts: 3823
20001000500100100100
Location: Bridgend S.Wales
now you mention this,im wondering if my gti head and gta bottem will mate okay.
didnt even consider the wet and damp option???
in that case id imagine it to be fine as its never raised an eyebrow before.....
 
AdrianSi
Posted 16/2/2006 6:57 AM (#110371 - in reply to #110327)
Subject: RE: wet liner or a damp one....


Expert

Posts: 8490
500020001000100100100100252525
Location: Midlands
mettymad - 16/2/2006 9:46 AM

I have been advised that I can fit a wet lined gti head onto my gta damp lined bottom, is this possible and easy to do. Any advice is welcome.

And I am sure there will be some comments and double inuendos regarding the above.


You can fit the 16v gti head on no problems at all as long as you 16v already. The only only difference between the Wet and damp liner engines in terms of mating the head to the bootom end is how the head gasket seals around the combustion chambers. There is only one type of head gasket and can be used with both types of engine and in fact all production k-series.

The main thing is whether or not it is 16v bottom end. HTH
 
tonyb
Posted 16/2/2006 7:03 AM (#110373 - in reply to #110371)
Subject: RE: wet liner or a damp one....


Electrical genius

Posts: 1310
1000100100100
Location: East Devon
Hi Adrian

Thought bottom end was same ie crank bearings etc.

Will check RAVE.

tony
 
Beep
Posted 16/2/2006 8:08 AM (#110392 - in reply to #110373)
Subject: RE: wet liner or a damp one....
10025
tonyb - 16/2/2006 1:03 PM

Hi Adrian

Thought bottom end was same ie crank bearings etc.

Will check RAVE.

tony


The only difference is the cut outs in the top of the pistons, late MPi 8v pistons had the cut outs for 16v, these are safe but the ones without the 16v cut outs aren't.
 
metrocedes
Posted 16/2/2006 8:58 AM (#110408 - in reply to #110371)
Subject: RE: wet liner or a damp one....


R116GTa

Posts: 3823
20001000500100100100
Location: Bridgend S.Wales
AdrianSi - 16/2/2006 12:57 PM

mettymad - 16/2/2006 9:46 AM

I have been advised that I can fit a wet lined gti head onto my gta damp lined bottom, is this possible and easy to do. Any advice is welcome.

And I am sure there will be some comments and double inuendos regarding the above.


The only only difference between the Wet and damp liner engines in terms of mating the head to the bootom end is how the head gasket seals around the combustion chambers.


what about all the oil and water ways.they are different so wont match.my mate who works with me just got back from a course in headquarters and the guy who teaches him used to work for rover.
they are totaly different as far as the linners and water/oil ways go.you cant remover one of the liners as all 4 are joined.
his honda civic has to be re-bored and has to have bigger pistons and ring to acomodate.its not a cheap job so new engine is on the books.
anyone got pictures??
 
metrocedes
Posted 16/2/2006 7:10 AM (#110375 - in reply to #110327)
Subject: RE: wet liner or a damp one....


R116GTa

Posts: 3823
20001000500100100100
Location: Bridgend S.Wales
so wat about the wet and damp question anyway.will they 'mate'.just been told by a work mate that they wont.

foget that.posted at the same time.doh

Edited by metrocedes 16/2/2006 7:12 AM
 
Beep
Posted 16/2/2006 9:59 AM (#110428 - in reply to #110327)
Subject: RE: wet liner or a damp one....
10025
Where does the Civic come into it?

As far as I know, the damp liner was a Rover innovation used only in the K-series and not adopted by any other manufacturer.

 
metrocedes
Posted 16/2/2006 10:56 AM (#110433 - in reply to #110428)
Subject: RE: wet liner or a damp one....


R116GTa

Posts: 3823
20001000500100100100
Location: Bridgend S.Wales
Barry - 16/2/2006 3:59 PM

Where does the Civic come into it?

As far as I know, the damp liner was a Rover innovation used only in the K-series and not adopted by any other manufacturer.


the civic come into it by the fact that its basicly the same engine.he has ....let just say wet liner.which is where the cylinder liners are all joined together and my engine had the damp where i could change the liners.
(we had both heads off on the same day)

edit-been trying to post for about 10mins.computer or site is fuked!!

i know these engines are not the same but the type of engine that they are is comparable and these are two different ones.anyway,that friend was in college and his tutor says they are different because of wat im saying.
i dont know %100 but he says he does.

Edited by metrocedes 16/2/2006 11:09 AM
 
AdrianSi
Posted 16/2/2006 12:09 PM (#110455 - in reply to #110327)
Subject: RE: wet liner or a damp one....


Expert

Posts: 8490
500020001000100100100100252525
Location: Midlands
The water and oil gallerys are the same on both varieties of engine. The only difference is in the liners them selves...the wet liner uses o-rings to seal the liners into the block and the dampliner uses sealent. Also the wet liners have a raised surface that the combustion rings on the headgasket seal around, whereas the dampliners surface is near enough flush with the surface of the block.

Also the block design internally and externally is different.

Edited by AdrianSi 16/2/2006 12:12 PM
 
metrocedes
Posted 16/2/2006 12:14 PM (#110457 - in reply to #110327)
Subject: RE: wet liner or a damp one....


R116GTa

Posts: 3823
20001000500100100100
Location: Bridgend S.Wales
ive been waiting for someone who knew for sure.thanks for clearing it up adrian.
and sorry if i sounded like i knew wat i was on about.just heard off a work mate about the different liners and he thought they would have different oil ways ect.
 
mettymad
Posted 16/2/2006 3:14 PM (#110502 - in reply to #110327)
Subject: RE: wet liner or a damp one....
Elite Veteran

Posts: 1104
1000100
Location: 1066 country
Hi Tony, did RAVE throw anything up as my friend ws a bit worried by it all.

I just would like to know if it is possible and if it is easier and less poblematic than doing the whole engine.

I have all replacement gaskets ready to throw on any way so that is not a problem.

I have a 96 reg mpi 8v so would that be ready for a 16 v head??

Edited by mettymad 16/2/2006 3:21 PM
 
tonyb
Posted 18/2/2006 5:57 AM (#110927 - in reply to #110502)
Subject: RE: wet liner or a damp one....


Electrical genius

Posts: 1310
1000100100100
Location: East Devon
Hi Elliot

Actually forgot to do it. Apart from RAVE I was going to check the EPC. Had other problems to deal
with this weekend.

Anyway I think all of the queries have been answered by Adrian, Barry etc.

The GTI head on the later block has been done many times.



tony
 
AdrianSi
Posted 16/2/2006 4:24 PM (#110520 - in reply to #110327)
Subject: RE: wet liner or a damp one....


Expert

Posts: 8490
500020001000100100100100252525
Location: Midlands
Yep that should be a prime candidate for a 16v head...you will know as soon as you take the head off, there will be extra cut outs per piston...just like the ones below:



Incidentally these are for sale if anybody is interested (OFFERS)

Edited by AdrianSi 16/2/2006 4:24 PM
 
mettymad
Posted 17/2/2006 3:29 AM (#110558 - in reply to #110327)
Subject: RE: wet liner or a damp one....
Elite Veteran

Posts: 1104
1000100
Location: 1066 country
Subtle advertising there lol


And to do this is an easy thing or not?? As it seems it is possible and as my bottom end has only done 15k I would prefer this on the car.

Edited by mettymad 17/2/2006 3:34 AM
 
metrocedes
Posted 17/2/2006 3:47 AM (#110561 - in reply to #110327)
Subject: RE: wet liner or a damp one....


R116GTa

Posts: 3823
20001000500100100100
Location: Bridgend S.Wales
well its not hard,its just nuts and bolts and then timing up realy.the bit im most concerned for is the ecu not running the engine after i swap everything.
 
mettymad
Posted 17/2/2006 7:35 AM (#110647 - in reply to #110327)
Subject: RE: wet liner or a damp one....
Elite Veteran

Posts: 1104
1000100
Location: 1066 country
But I will be using ecu from my 100 anyway and that wil work on the gti, and as it is the 100 damp liner I am using it should do??
 
metrocedes
Posted 17/2/2006 7:47 AM (#110657 - in reply to #110327)
Subject: RE: wet liner or a damp one....


R116GTa

Posts: 3823
20001000500100100100
Location: Bridgend S.Wales
do you think your immobiliser will work??surely the ecu from the 8valve wont work %100??
if it does then i can do this also.
 
mettymad
Posted 17/2/2006 8:21 AM (#110690 - in reply to #110327)
Subject: RE: wet liner or a damp one....
Elite Veteran

Posts: 1104
1000100
Location: 1066 country
It will work but not as efficient as the ecu I have brought, a 214i 16v 96 reg.

I dont see any problems but if you do a search for gti - gta there is a thread which explains how this is done.
 
metrocedes
Posted 20/2/2006 11:39 AM (#111587 - in reply to #110327)
Subject: RE: wet liner or a damp one....


R116GTa

Posts: 3823
20001000500100100100
Location: Bridgend S.Wales
here are the metro and civic bottem ends.quite similar but different linners.




(i2picture025.jpg)



(i1picture031.jpg)



Attachments
----------------
Attachments i2picture025.jpg (8KB - 102 downloads)
Attachments i1picture031.jpg (8KB - 104 downloads)
Printer friendly version
E-mail a link to this thread
Jump to forum :


(Delete all cookies set by this site)
Running MegaBBS ASP Forum Software v2.0
© 2003 PD9 Software